Unseeing is believing I’m gonna be rich

Not really a masterpiece

Katie H.

I’m rarely completely turned off by a book.  There’s usually some element I can grasp on to, some certain factor I can point to that appeals.  But after reading Jane Hamilton’s latest novel, Laura Rider’s Masterpiece, I find myself regarding it with a sour taste in my mouth. 

Hamilton, a Wisconsin author, usually writes longer novels dealing with the nuances of family issues.  Masterpiece is a complete departure, a farce about the writing life, how the general public relate to celebrity and the deliciously absurd conviction many people harbor that they have a story to tell.  Like most farces, Hamilton uses a bitingly ironic tone, never leaving any doubt that she’s pulling the strings that put her characters through their paces. 

Laura Rider, the proprietor of a landscaping business between Madison and Milwaukee, is utterly smitten with the host of a Milwaukee public radio show, Jenna Faroli.  Happily for her, Jenna is now an inhabitant of the same small town.  A chance encounter between Jenna and Laura’s husband Charlie sets up the development of a love triangle between the three–with Laura penning Charlie’s amourous emails to the lonely Jenna.  Soon, Jenna and Charlie are romping in the woods, strolling through fields of lavender, and meeting up at the Kewaskum Inn.  That Laura plans to write a romance novel with similar characters striving towards ‘a higher consciousness’ in their love affair happens to be a coincidence–right? 

The set up here is more interesting than the conclusion, as it’s pretty obvious where this is headed.  But the problem here lies more in the characterization than the plot.  Hamilton’s characters are easy targets, stereotypes that make play out the farce easily enough but which few readers would be able to make any sort of connection.  Laura is conniving, using her husband ruthlessly while naive enough to think she understands great writing from repeated viewings of Pride and PrejudiceDim bulb Charlie would be loveable but for his absolute blindness of how much he is being manipulated by both women.  And Jenna seems the easiest mark of all.  With her spare time filled with French-language Scrabble with poet friends and a husband whose obsession with gourmet cooking is matched only by his compulsive reading, Jenna’s character hits on all the tired markers of upper-class liberal intellectual smugness.  Farce requires a healthy dose of acerbicy, but Hamilton crosses the line into spitefulness.  The whole book has the sense of a mean joke at which everyone feels compelled to laugh, but feels guilty about afterward.

Entry Filed under: Literary Fiction

3 Comments Add your own

  • 1. katharine  |  July 15th, 2009 at 12:50 pm

    I’m trying to come up with the reason why I felt totally opposite of Katie about this book. It may just be that I consider Jane Hamilton one of my favorite authors and enjoy everything that she publishes. If anything I would say Hamilton is poking fun of the literary circles and “highbrow” public radio world she is a part of herself, which is somewhat self deprecating and I like that. You were neglect in mentioning though the uncanny resemblance to well known NPR celeb Jean Ferraca that Jenna’s character seems to have. Is Hamilton an old friend or old foe? Lots of gossip about this in Wisconsin literary circles I”m sure.

  • 2. Katie H.  |  July 16th, 2009 at 10:42 am

    I agree that Masterpiece is lampooning a certain high-brow culture, but I felt the snarkiness just got to be too much (and Hamilton herself noted the snark level in her April Bookpage interview). And the unevenness of the characters was something that often came up when I discussed the book with others who had read it.

    Yes, there is definitely a Jean Farraca element to the book for those familiar with NPR talk radio and WPR in particular. Personally I don’t listen to Ferraca, but I knew about the connection before I read the book from other readers listen and saw the similarities. I decided not to include it in the review because I wanted to approach the novel more from a general audience view rather than someone more familiar with the specific people the author may or may not have had in mind.

    I’ve read a few of Hamilton’s other books and I enjoyed When Madeline Was Young, but was disappointed with Disobedience for some of the same characterization issues as Masterpiece. This one just felt rough, like it needed more attention to character consistency to really make it work. Hamilton can write really compelling, memorable fiction, but I still think this isn’t up to her usual standard.

  • 3. Molly  |  July 16th, 2009 at 2:13 pm

    This little book certainly makes for a lively discussion! When I read this for book group, everyone either loved it or hated it.

Leave a Comment

hidden

Some HTML allowed:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Trackback this post  |  Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed


Most Recent Posts

Recent Comments

Categories

Posts by Author

Links

Feeds