Is “no nukes” possible?
May 24th, 2007 Sarah - Alicia Ashman
include("adsense.php"); ?>The other day I read a review of of William Langewiesche’s new nonfiction book, The Atomic Bazaar: The Rise of the Nuclear Poor, and one sentence in particular caught my attention:
“The most alarming thing about ‘The Atomic Bazaar’ is its utter lack of alarmism.”
And that’s about right. I’ve read the book (yes, I know you’re supposed to read the review first, but I’m always doing things backwards), and marveled at the author’s clarity, particularly considering the stories he tells: in one chapter, he explores how nuclear bombs actually work. In the next, he considers how the required knowledge and components to build a bomb could be obtained by rogue nations or groups; then he gives a history of Pakistan’s development of nuclear weapons.
So how does he manage to explore these topics with such calm? Well, frankly, I don’t know how he manages to do that. But it was a relief to read a nonfiction book on an important subject that wasn’t simply preaching to a choir already in place. He’s got a talent for providing nuanced discussions of complex and controversial subjects: in Cutting for Sign, he examined illegal immigration; in The Outlaw Sea he explained the lawlessness and piracy still rampant on the world’s oceans.
Entry Filed under: Nonfiction
Leave a Comment
Some HTML allowed:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>
Trackback this post | Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed